Page 1 of 1
Re: Wouldn't it be ironic
Posted: Sun Dec 01, 2024 6:33 pm
by PAL
Meth. We're on it. Great slogan by Kristi Noem. Ironic.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0blILDdvHSw
Re: Wouldn't it be ironic
Posted: Sun Dec 01, 2024 6:32 am
by mister_coffee
You do not understand how lawsuits and the justice system work.
Re: Wouldn't it be ironic
Posted: Sat Nov 30, 2024 5:00 pm
by Jingles
Considering sideshow Bob has publicly stated that he will not cooperate with or allow the Feds to apprehend and deport illegals from WA state this could be a very interesting circus to watch. Imagine Sideshow Bob being charged in a Federal court for aiding and abetting especially with no Russian collusion or Mueller report
Re: Wouldn't it be ironic
Posted: Sat Nov 30, 2024 8:42 am
by dorankj
But feds have supremacy in federal law enforcement and stopping access to criminal aliens is aiding and abetting so maybe don’t be such a tool!
Re: Wouldn't it be ironic
Posted: Sat Nov 30, 2024 7:02 am
by mister_coffee
Yes, it would be. I look forward to them trying to do that, if only for the entertainment value.
It is well established that only the federal government has jurisdiction in immigration law. So I'd argue that local and state law enforcement agencies that stay out of that are obeying the law. It would truly be ironic if a supposed "law-and-order" government went after people for obeying the law.
Wouldn't it be ironic
Posted: Fri Nov 29, 2024 4:11 pm
by Jingles
Wouldn't it be ironic that as long as Sideshow Bob refuses to cooperate with ICE in deporting criminal illegals the FEDS refuse to issue/ give any federal grants to anyone in WA? No they probably can't withhold federal funds for highways and schools but can and should refuse to give any grants as long as Sideshow Bob refuses to cooperate with ICE and protects illegals with criminal records